- Quelques études et articles scientifiques relatifs aux effets des champs électromagnétiques artificiels (publications par années)
- Cancers
- Faune (animaux)
- Flore (plantes)
- Exemples de biais des études des lobbies industriels niant les effets nocifs
En 1971, un médecin, Zory Glaser, du Naval Medical Research Institute répertoria plus de 2300* publications d’études biologiques et médicales mettant en cause les radiofréquences et les micro-ondes : www.zoryglaser.com.
* Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (« Effects ») and Clinical manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radiofrequency Radiation, Naval Medical Research Institute, 4 Oct 1971.
La biologiste canadienne, Magda Havas dit que le Dr Glaser avait répertorié en 2010 plus de 6 000 publications scientifiques d’études biologiques et médicales mettant en cause les radiofréquences et les micro-ondes (“Zory’s Historical Archive of Microwave Radiation Effects” [« Archives historiques de Zory sur les effets des rayonnements micro-ondes »] : https://magdahavas.com/from-zorys-archive/introduction-to-from-zorys-archive/
L’OMS a reconnu en 2002 le rôle cancérigène possible des extrêmement basses fréquences :
IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans / Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields. IARC Press, Lyon, France. 2002.
L‘OMS a reconnu en 2004 l’intolérance environnementale idiopathique [sans cause connue] attribués aux champs électromagnétiques :
OMS, WHO workshop on electromagnetic hypersensitivity (2004),October 25-27,Prague, Czech Republic, www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/hypersensitivity_prague2004/en/index.html.
Hansson Mild K, Repacholi M, van Deventer E, Ravazzani P, eds. 2006. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Proceeding, International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, October 25-27, 2004. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO Press. p. 16.
L‘OMS a reconnu en 2005 l’électrohypersensibité comme condition pathologie morbide idiopathique [sans cause connue](mais sans reconnaître que l’EHS soit causée par les champs électromagnétiques ni non plus qu’elle ne le soit pas ; cependant c’est un double langage de mensonge car l’EHS est un abaissement du seuil de tolérance : Contre quoi le cerveau abaisse t-il son seuil de tolérance ? Contre les champs électromagnétiques, donc les champs électromagnétiques sont la cause) :
OMS, Aide-Mémoire N° 296, Champs électromagnétiques et santé publique – Hypersensibilité électromagnétique, Décembre 2005. https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs296_fr/en/
L’OMS a reconnu en 2013 le rôle cancérigène possible des radiofréquences :
IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans / Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. IARC Press, Lyon, France. 2013.
Quelques études et articles scientifiques relatifs aux effets des champs électromagnétiques artificiels (publications par années)
Frey AH. Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy. J Appl Physiol. 1962 Jul;17:689-692.
Randolph, T.G. Human Ecology and Susceptibility to the Chemical Environment; Charles C Thomas: Springfield, IL, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar].
Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System, German Translation. Bergman, W. Research and Scientific Laboratory, Ford Motor Company by the Technical Library Research Service. 82 pp.1965.
Schwan, HP, A Anne, and L Sher. Microwave studies with human subjects. Heating of Living Tissue. Aerospace Crew Equipment Laboratory, U.S. Naval Air Engineering Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., NAEC-ACEL-534. 38 pp., 1966.
Janet Healer, “Biological Effects and Health Implications of Microwave Radiation” symposium, 1969.
Dodge CH. Clinical and hygienic aspects of exposure to electromagnetic fields. in Biological Effects and Health Implications of microwave Radiation, « Symp. Proc, S.I. Cleary, Ed., USD-HEW, Dept. BRH/DBE, 1970;70-72:140-149.
Petrov, I.R. (Ed). Influence of Microwave Radiation on the Organism of Man and Animals. Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, NASA TT F-708.1970.
Influence of Microwave Radiation on the Organism of Man and Animals. Edited by I. R. Petrov, Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR Translation of « Vliyaniye SVCh-Izlucheniya na Organizm Cheloveka i Zhivotnykh. II « Meditsina » Press, Leningrad, 1970 Conclusion.
Glotova KU, Sadchikova MN. Development and clinical course of cardiovascular changes after chronic exposure to microwave irradiation, JPRS 51238, Arlington, vA, Joint Publications Research Service, 25 Aug 1970.
Michelson SM, Dodge CH. Soviet views on the biological effects of microwaves – An analysis. Health Phys. 1971;21:108-111.
Kulikovskaya, Ye.L. Protection from the Effect of Radio Waves, JPRS 52622, 15 March 1971, 155 pp.
Navy Testing Microwave Risk, United Feature Syndicate, 1972.
UHF Irradiation and the Worker in Industry, JPRS 57711, 7 December 1972, 15 pp.
Environmental pollution by microwave radiation – A potential threat to human health – Report, JA Tanner, Division of Mechanical Engineering and coauthored by faculty in the Department of Anatomy at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, 1973.
Microwave Reflection, Diffraction and Transmission by man. A pilot study. Vernon R. Reno, et al. Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Pensacola, Florida 11 June 1973.
Guy AW, Chou CK, Lin JC, Christensen D. Microwave-induced acoustic effects in mammalian auditory systems and physical materials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Feb 28;247:194-218.
Evrard E. Pathologie professionnelle du personnel chargé de la sécurité de la navigation aérienne, Précis de Médecine Aéronautique et Spatiale. Paris: Maloine 1975, pp. 397-408.
Gandhi OP. Conditions of strongest of electromagnetic power deposition in man and animals. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 1975;23:1021-1029.
Vernon R. Reno. Some considerations concerning the use of magnetron generators in microwave biological research, Department of the Navy, Aerospace Med Research Laboratory, 1975.
Lin JC. Microwave auditory effect – a comparison of some possible transduction mechanisms. J Microw Power. 1976 Mar;11(1):77-81.
A Report on the Safety from Electromagnetic Radiation in and around the CN Tower. 1976.
Lin JC. Further Studies on the Microwave Effect. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 1977 Nov;25(11):938-948.
Taylor, L.S. and A.Y. Cheung. The Physical Basis of Electromagnetic Interactions with Biological Systems. At the University of Maryland, College Park, June 15-17, 1977. 410 pp.
Oscar KJ, Hawkins TD. Microwave alteration of the blood-brain barrier system of rats. Brain Res. 1977;126:281-293. Doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90726-0.
Merritt JH, Chamness AF, Allen SJ. Studies on blood-brain barrier permeability after microwave-radiation. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1978;15:367-377. Doi: 10.1007/BF01323461.
M.A. Stuchly, M.H. Repacholi, D. Lecuyer and R. Manni. Radiation Survey of Dielectric (RF) Heaters in Canada, 1980.
James Kinn, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Elliot Postow, Naval Medical R&D : list of 3627 publications on the biological effects of electromagnetic radiation from 1 to 100 GHz. pdf document 574 page, 1980.
Lin JC. The Microwave Auditory Phenomenon. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1980 Jan;68(1):67-73.
“Early Research on the Biological Effects of Microwave Radiation: 1940-1960.” Cook et al. 1980. Annals of Science 37: 323-351.
Leruz P. Contribution à l’étude des effets biologiques des rayonnements non ionisants. Effets spécifiques (non thermiques) des ondes électromagnétiques, de très haute fréquence, sur les fonctions corticotrope et gonadotripe chez le rat blanc. Thèse Physiologie Animale, Université Rennes 1, 6 Novembre 1980.
Perry FS, Reichmanis M, Marino AA, Becker RO. Environmental power-frequency magnetic fields and suicide. Health Phys. 1981 Aug;41(2):267-277.
Lyle DB, Schechter P, Adey WR, Lundak RL. Suppression of T-lymphocyte cytotoxycity following exposure to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1983; 4(3):281-292.
Perry S, Pearl L, Binns R. Power frequency magnetic field; depressive illness and myocardial infarction. Public Health. 1989 May;103(3):177-180.
Nair, I, MG Morgan, and HK Florig. Biological Effects of Power Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields, Background paper as part of OTA’s assessment of Electric Power Wheeling and Dealing: Technological Considerations for Increasing Competition, Department.
Wei LX, Goodman R, Henderson A. Changes in levels of c-myc and histone H2B following exposure of cells to low frequency sinusoidal electromagnetic fields: evidence for a window effect. Bioelectromagnetics. 1990;11:269-272.
Wilson BW, Wright CW, Morris JE, Buschbom RL, Brown DP, Miller DL, Sommers-Flannigan R, Anderson LE. Evidence for an effect of ELF electromagnetic fields on human pineal gland function. J Pineal Res. 1990;9(4):259-269.
Teng Jian J, Yan H, Vanhoenacker D, Vander Vorst A. Inhibition of the nociceptive response of the parafascilular nucleus, due to microwave irradiation on spinal cord in rabbits. Proc Eur Microwave Conf. Stuttgart, Sept. 1991, pp. 1438-1443.
Bell, I.R.; Miller, C.S.; Schwartz, G.E. An olfactory-limbic model of multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: Possible relationships to kindling and affective spectrum disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 1992, 32, 218–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rea WJ, Pan Y, Yenyves EJ, Sujisawa J, Sujisawa H, Samadi N, Ross GH. Electromagnetic Field Sensitivity Case study evaluation. J Bioelectricity. 1991;10(1&2), 214-256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef].
Hotary KB, Robinson KR. Evidence of a role for endogenous electrical fields in chick embryo development, Development. 1992 Apr;114(4):985-996.
Kirschvink JL, Kobayashi-Kirschvink A, Woodford BJ. Magnitite biomineralization in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992 Aug 15;89(16):7683-7687.
Walleczek J. Electromagnetic field effects on cells of the immune system: the role of calcium signaling. FASEB J. 1992;6:3177-3185.
Nutticelli R. Endogenous ionic currents and DC electric fields in multicellular animal tissues, Bioelectromagnetics. 1992;Suppl 1:147-157.
Meggs, W.J. Neurogenic inflammation and sensitivity to environmental chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993, 101, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Poole C, Kavet R, Funch DP, Donelan K, Charry JM, Dreyer NA. Depressive symptoms and headaches in relation to proximity of residence to an alternating-current transmission line right-of-way. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Feb 1;137(3):318-330.
Juutilainen J, Matilainen P, Saankoski S, Laara E, Suonio S. Early pregnancy loss and exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1993;14(3):229-236.
Gold S, Goodman R, Shirley-Henderson A. Exposure of Simian virus-40- transformed human cells to magnetic fields results in increased levels of T-antigen mRNA and protein. Bioelectromagnetics. 1994;15:329-336.
Salford LG, Brun A, Sturesson K, Eberhardt JL, Persson BR. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier induced by 915 MHz electromagnetic radiation, continuous wave and modulated at 8, 16, 50, and 200 Hz. Microsc Res Tech. 1994;27:535-542. Doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070270608.
Sobel, E.; Davanipour, Z.; Sulkava, R.; Erkinjuntti, T.; Wikstrom, J.; Henderson, V.W.; Buckwalter, G.; Bowman, J.D.; Lee, P. Occupations with exposure to electromagnetic fields: A possible risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1995, 142, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dunn JR, Fuller M, Zoeger J, Dobson J, Heller F, Hammann J, Caine E, Moscowitz BM. Magnetic material in the human hippocampus. Brain Res Bull. 1995;36(2):149-153.
Gandhi OP, Lazzi G, Furse CM. Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory Tech. 1996;44(10):1884-1897.
Sobel, E.; Dunn, M.; Davanipour, Z.; Qian, Z.; Chui, H.C. Elevated risk of Alzheimer’s disease among workers with likely electromagnetic field exposure. Neurology 1996, 47, 1477–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
S. Davis, « Weak Residential Magnetic Fields Affect Melatonin in Humans », Microwave News, vol. 17, n°6, nov-dec 1997, http://microwavenews.com/news/backissues/n-d97issue.pdf
Verkasalo PK, Kaprio J, Varjonen J, Romanov K, Heikkila K, Koskenvuo M. Magnetic fields of transmission lines and depression. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec 15;146(12):1037-1045.
Belyaev IY, Alipov YD, Harms-Ringdahl M. Effects of zero magnetic field on the conformation of chromatin in human cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1336:465-473.
Miller CS. Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance – an emerging theory of disease? Environ Health Perspect 1997;105(Suppl 2): 445-453.
Meggs, W.J. Hypothesis for induction and propagation of chemical sensitivity based on biopsy studies. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997, 105, 473–478. [Google Scholar]
Bergqvist, U.; Vogel, E. Possible Health Implications of Subjective Symptoms and Electromagnetic Fields. In A Report Prepared by a European Group of Experts for the European Commission, DGV; Arbete Och Hälsa, 19; Swedish National Institute for Working Life: Stockholm, Sweden, 1997. [Google Scholar]
Savitz DA, Loomis DP, Tse CK. Electrical Occupations and Neurodegenerative Disease: Analysis of U.S. Mortality Data. Arch Environ Health. 1998 Jan-Feb;(1):71-74.
Burch JB, Reif JS, Yost MG, Keefe TJ, Pitrat CA. Nocturnal excretion of a urinary melatonin metabolite among electric utility workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Jun;24(3):183-9.
Savitz DA, Checkoway H, Loomis DP. Magnetic Field Exposure and Neurodegenerative Disease Mortality Among Electric Utility Workers. Epidemiology. 1998 Jul;9(4):398-404.
Hocking, B. Preliminary report: Symptoms associated with mobile phone use. Occup. Med. 1998, 48, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burch JB, Reif JS, Yost MG Keefe TJ, Pitrat CA. Reduced excretion of excretion of a melatonin metabolite in workers exposed to 60 Hz magnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150(1):27-36.
Cardinali DP, Brusco LI, Cutrera RA, Castrillon P, Esquifino AI. Melatonin as a time-meaningful signal in circadian organization of immune response. Biol Signals Recept. Jan-Apr 1999;8(1-2):41-48.
Bartha L, Baumzweiger W, Buscher DS, Callender T, Dahl KA, Davidoff A, Donnay A, Edelson SB, Elson BD, Elliott E, Flayhan DP, Heuser G, Keyl PM, Kilburn KH, et al. Multiple chemical sensitivity: a 1999 consensus. Arch Environ Health. 1999 May-Jun;54(3)-147-149. [Google Scholar] https://doi.org/10.1080/00039899909602251
Neil Cherry, EMR Reduces Melatonin in Animals and People, 26 juillet 2000, www.feb.se/EMFguru/Research/emf/emr/EMR-Reduces-Melatonin.htm
van Wijngaarden E, Savitz DA, Kleckner RC, Cai J, Loomis D. Exposure to electromagnetic fields and suicide among electric utility workers: a nested case-control study. West J Med. 2000 Aug;173(2):94-100.
de Pomerai D, Daniells C, David H, et al. Non-thermal heat-shock response to microwaves. Nature. 2000;405:417–418. Doi: 10.1038/35013144.
Sancar A. Cryptochrome: the second photoactive pigment in the eye its role in circadian photoreception. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:31-67.
French PW, Penny R, Laurence JA, McKenzie DR. Mobile phones, heat shock proteins and cancer. Differentiation. 2001;67:93–97. Doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.670401.x.
James C. Lin, Hearing Microwaves: The Microwave Auditory Phenomenon. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine. 2001 dec;43(6):166-168.
Hocking, B.; Westerman, R. Neurological changes induced by a mobile phone. Occup. Med. 2002, 52, 413–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hillert, L.; Berglind, N.; Arnetz, B.B.; Bellander, T. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 2002, 28, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burch JB, Reif JS, Noonan CW, Ichinose T, Bachand AM, Koleber TL, Yost MG. Melatonin metabolite excretion among cellular telephone users. Int J Radiat Biol. 2002 Nov;78(11):1029-36.
Santini R, Seigne M, Bonhomme-Faivre L, Bouet S, Defrasme E, Sage M. Symptoms experienced by users of digital cellular phones: A study of a French engineering school. Electromagn Biol Med. 2002;21:81-88.
Levallois, P. Hypersensitivity of human subjects to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: A review of the literature. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Frick, U.; Rehm, J.; Eichhammer, P. Risk perception, somatization, and self-report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields—A randomized survey study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2002, 205, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgrem L, Persson BR. Nerve cell dommage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):881-883. Doi: 10.1289/ehp.6039.
Santini R, Santini P, LeRuz P, Danze JM, Seigne M. Survey study of people living in the vicinity of cellular phone base stations. Electromagn Biol Med 2003;22:41-49.
Hakansson N, Gustavsson P, Johansen C, Floderus B. Neurodegenerative Disease in Welders and Other Workers Exposed to High Levels of Magnetic Fields. Epidemiology. 2003 Jul;14(4):420-426.
Nuccitelli R. A role for endogenous electric fields in wound healing. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;58:1-26.
Mild, K.H.; Repacholi, M.; van Deventer, E.; Ravazzani, P. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. In Proceedings of the WHO International Seminar and Working Group Meeting on EMF Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, 25–27 October 2004; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. ISBN 92-4-159412-8. [Google Scholar].
Brugh VM 3rd, Lipshultz LI. Male factor infertility: evaluation and management. Med Clin North Am. 2004 Mar;88(2):367-85.
Fojt L, Strasak L, Vetterl V, Smarda J. Comparison of the low-frequency magnetic field effects on bacteria Escherichia coli, Leclercia adecarboxylata and Staphylococcus aureus. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004 Jun;63(1-2):337-341.
Lupke M, Rollwitz J, Simko M. Cell activating capacity of 50 Hz magnetic fields to release reactive oxygen intermediates in human umbilical cord blood-derived monocytes and in Mono Mac 6 cells. Free Radic Res. 2004;38:985-993.
Lai H, Singh NP. Magnetic fields-induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells of the rats. Environ Health perspec 2004;112(6):687-694.
Lacour, M.; Zunder, T.; Schmidtke, K.; Vaith, P.; Scheidt, C. Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS)—Suggestions for an extension of the U.S. MCS-case definition. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2005, 208, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
WHO (World Health Organization). Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health, Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity; WHO Fact Sheet No. 296; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
Miller D, Barkhof F, Montalban X, Thompson A, Filippi M. Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part I: natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis. Lancet Neurol. 2005 May;4(5):281-288.
Sedghi H, Zare S, Hayatgeibi H, Alivandi S, Ebadi AG. Effects of 50 HZ Magnetic Field on Some Factors of Immune System in the Male Guinea Pigs. Am J Immun. 2005;1:37-41.
Koyu A1, Cesur G, Ozguner F, Akdogan M, Mollaoglu H, Ozen S. Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic field on TSH and thyroid hormones in rats. Toxicol Lett. 2005 Jul 4;157(3);257-262.
McCaig CD, Rajnicek AM, Song B, Zhao M. Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potential. Physiol Rev. 2005 Jul;85(3):943-979.
Kheifets L, Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer E. The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields. Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e303-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pokorny J, Hasek J, Jelinek F. Endogenous Electric Field and Organization of Living Matter. Electromag Biol Med. 2005;24:185-197.
Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rudiger H. Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat Res. 2005;583:178-183.
Hardeland R. Antioxydative protection by melatonin: multiplicity of mechanisms from radical detoxification to radical avoidance. Endocrine. 2005;27:119-130.
WHO (World Health Organization). Framework for Developing Health-Based EMF Standards. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; ISBN 9241594330.
WHO (World Health Organization), 2006. Framework for Developing Health-Based EMF
Standards. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; ISBN 9241594330.
www.who.int/peh-emf/standards/EMF_standards_framework%5b1%5d.pdf
Schüz, J.; Petters, C.; Egle, U.T.; Jansen, B.; Kimbel, R.; Letzel, S.; Nix, W.; Schmidt, L.G.; Vollrath, L. The “Mainzer EMF-Wachhund”: Results from a watchdog project on self-reported health complaints attributed to exposure to electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2006, 27, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Eliyahu I, Luria R, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N, Shani G. Effects of radiofrequency radiation emitted by cellular telephones on the cognitive functions of humans. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006 Feb;27(2):119-126.
Schreier, N.; Huss, A.; Röösli, M. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: A cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland. Soz. Praventivmed. 2006, 51, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Udroiu I, Cristaldi M, Leradi LA, Bedini A, Giuliani L, Tanzarella C. Clastogenicity and aneuploidy in newborn and adult mice exposed to 50 Hz magnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 2006;82(8):561-567.
Vander Vorst A, Rosen A, Kotsuha Y. RF/microwave interaction with biological tissues. 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hallberg O and Oberfeld G. Will We All Become Electrosensitive? Electromagnetic Biology and Medecine, 25:189-191, 2006.
Rubin, G.J.; Hahn, G.; Everitt, B.S.; Cleare, A.J.; Wessely, S. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study. BMJ 2006, 332, 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stacy Eltiti, Denise Wallace, Konstantina Zougkou, Riccardo Russo, Stephen Joseph, Paul Rasor, and Elaine Fox. Development and Evaluation of the Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Questionnaire. 2007.
Chou CK. Thirty five years in bioelectromagnetics research. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007 Jan 28(1):3-15.
de la Puente MP, Balmori A. Addiction to cells phones: are there neurophysiological mechanisms involved? Proyecto. 2007 March;61:8-12 ; WHO gaming Disorder. Janv 2018.
Boscolo P, Di Gioacchino M, Di Giampaolo L, Antonucci A, Di Luzio S. Combined effects of electromagnetic fields on immune and nervous responses. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007 Apr-Jun;20(2 Suppl 2):59-63.
Lin JC, Wang Z. Hearing of microwave pulses by humans and animals: effects, mechanism, and thresholds. Health Phys. 2007 Jun;92(6):621-628.
Brillaut E, Piotrowski A, [de Seze R]. Effect of an acute 900 MHz GSM exposure on glia in the rat brain: a time-dependent study. Toxicology. 2007;238(1):23-33.
Hillert, L.; Musabasic, V.; Berglund, H.; Ciumas, C.; Savic, I. Odor processing in multiple chemical sensitivity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Eberhardt JL, Persson BR, Brun AE, Salford LG, Malmgren LO. Blood-brain barrier permeability and nerve cell damage in rat brain 14 and 28 days after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Electromagn Biol Med. 2008;27:215-229. Doi: 10.1080/15368370802344037.
Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Burgio E, Carpenter DO. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2008;242:643-658. Doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019.
Agarwall A, Deepinder F, Sharma RK, Ranga G, Li J. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic an observational study. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):124-128.
Hardell L, Sage C. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008 Feb;62(2):104-109.
Garcia AM, Sisternas A, Hoyos SP. Occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;37(2):329-340.
Lucy Johnson, Suicides « Linked to Phone Masts », Express.co.uk, 22 juin 2008, <www.express.co.uk/posts/view/49330/Suicides-linked-tophone-masts>
Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology. 2008 Jul;19(4):523-539.
Ammari M, Lecomte A, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, [de Seze R]. Exposure to GSM 900 MHz electromagnetic fields affects cerebral cytochrome c oxidase activity. Toxicology. 2008 Aug 19;250(1):70-74.
Ha JH, Chin B, Park DH, Ryu SH, Yu J. Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Dec;11(6):783-784.
Garcia, A.M.; Sisternas, A.; Hoyos, S.P. Occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields and Alzheimer disease: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008, 37, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mortazavi SM, Daiee E, Yazdi A, Khiabani K, Kavousi A, Vazirinejad R, Behnejad B, Ghasemi M, Balali Mood M. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11:1142-6.
Bas O, Odaci E, Kaplan S, Acer N, Ucok K, Colakoglu S. 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposure affects qualitative and quantitative features of hippocampal pyramidal cells in the adult female rat. Brain Res. 2008;1265:178-185.
Ammari M, Brillaut E, Gamez C, Lecomte A, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, [de Seze R]. Effect of a chronic GSM 900 MHz exposure on glia in the rat brain. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62(4):273-281.
Röösli, M. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review. Environ. Res. 2008, 107, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huss A, Spoerri A, Egger M, Roosli M; Swiss National Cohort Study. Residence near power lines and mortality from neurodegenerative diseases: longitudinal study of the Swiss population. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jan 15;169(2):167-175.
Blank M, Goodman R. Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology. 2009;16:71–78. Doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.006.
Wang, L.; Peng, R.; Hu, X.-J.; Gao, Y.-B.; Wang, S.-M.; Zhao, L.; Dong, J.; Su, Z.-T.; Xu, X.-P.; Gao, R.-L.; et al. Abnormality of synaptic vesicular associated proteins in cerebral cortex and hippocampus after microwave exposure. Synapse 2009, 63, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Trosic I, Pavicic I. Disturbance of cell proliferation in response to mobile phone frequency radiation. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2009 Mar;60(1):109-115.
Bas O, Odaci E, Kaplan S, Acer N, Ucok K, Colakoglu S. 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposure affects qualitative and quantitative features of hippocampal pyramidal cells in the adult female rat. Brain Res. 2009 Apr 10;1265:178-185.
Luria R, Eliyahu I, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N. Cognitive effects of radiation emitted by cellular phones: the influence of exposure side and time. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009 Apr;30(3):198-204.
De lullis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One. 2009 Jul 31;4(7):e6446.
Johansson O. Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields-A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):157-177.
Davanipour Z, Sobel E. Long-term exposure to magnetic fields and the risks of Alzheimer’s disease and breast cancer: Further biological research. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):149-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yao L, McCaig CD, Zhao M. Electrical signals polarize neuronal organelles, direct neuron migration, and orient cell division. Hippocampus. 2009 Sep;19(9):855-868.
Agarwall A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, Sharma R. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1318-1325.
Mortavazi S, Habib A, Ganj-Karami A, Samimi-Doost R, Pour-Abedi A, Babaie A. Alterations in TSH and thyroid hormones following mobile phone use. Oman Med J. 2009 Oct;24(4):274-278.
Adang D, Remacle C, Vander Vorst A. Results of a long-term low-level microwave exposure of rats. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2009 Oct;57(10):2488-2497.
Belyaev IY, Markova E, Hillert K, Malmgren LO, Persson BR. Microwaves from UMT/GSM mobile phones induce long-lasting inhibition of 53BP1/gamma-H2AX DNA repair foci in human lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30:129-141.
Ruedigez HW. Genetoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field. Pathophysiology. 2009;16(2):67-69.
Dahmen N, Ghezel-Ahmadi D, Engel A. Blood laboratory findings in patients suffering from self-perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30:299-306. Doi: 10.1002/bem.20486.
Nittby H, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Malmgren L, Persson BR, Salford LG. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone. Pathophysiology. 2009;16:103-112. Doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.001
Ding G-R, Li K-C, Wang X-W, et al. Effect of electromagnetic pulse exposure on brain micro vascular permeability in rats. Biomed Environ Sci. 2009;22:265-268. Doi: 10.1016/S0895-3988(09)60055-6.
Grigoriev YG, Grigoriev OA, Ivanov AA, Lyaginskaya AM, Merkulov AV, Stepanov VS, Shagina NB. Autoimmune process after long-term low-level exposure to electromagnetic field (experimental results). Part 1. Mobile communications and changes in electromagnetic conditions for the population: Need for additional substantiation of existing hygienic standards. Biophysics 2010;55: 1041-1045.
NON-THERMAL EFFECTS AND MECHANISMS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AND LIVING MATTER. National Institute for the Study and Control of Cancer and Environmental Diseases “Bernardino Ramazzini” Bologna, Italy 2010.
Xu S, Zhou Z, Zhang L, Yu Z, Zhang W, Wang Y, Wang X, Li M, Chen Y, Chen C, He M, Zhang G, Zhang M. Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA in primary cultured neurons. Brain Res. 2010 Jan 22;1311:189-196.
Grigoriev luG, Grigoriev OA, Ivanov AA, Liaginskaia AM, Merkulov AV, Stepanov VS, Shagina NB. Autoimmune process after long-term low-level exposure to electromagnetic field (experimental results). Part 1. Mobile communications and changes in electromagnetic conditions for the population: Need for additional substantiation of existing hygienic standards. Radiats Biol Radioecol. 2010 Jan-Feb;50(1):6-11.
Irigaray P, Belpomme D. Basic properties and molecular mechanisms of exogenous chemical carcinogens. Carcinogenesis. 2010 Feb;31(2):135-148.
Augner C, Hacker GW, Oberfeld G, Florian M, Hitzl W, Hutter J, Pauser G. Effects of exposure to GSM mobile phone base station signals on salivary cortisol, alpha-amylase, and immunoglobulin A. Biomed Environ Sci. 2010 Jun;(3):199-207.
Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. The effect of exposure duration on the biological activity of mobile telephony radiation. Mutat Res. 2010 Jun 17;699(1-2):17-22.
Chavdoula ED, Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. Comparison of biological effects between continuous and intermittent exposure to GSM-900-MHz mobile phone radiation: Detection of apoptotic cell-death features. Mutat Res. 2010 Jul 19;700(1-2):51-61.
Frohlich F, McCormick DA. Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity. Neuron. 2010 Jul 15;67(1):129-143.
Bale TL, Baram TZ, Brown AS, Goldstein JM, Insel TR, McCarthy MM, Nemeroff CB, Reyes TM, Simerly RB, Susser ES, Nestler EJ. Early life programming and neurodevelopmental disorders. Biol Psychiatry, 2010 Aug 15;68(4):314-319.
Kowalczuk C, Yarwood G, Blackwell R, Priestner M, Sienkiewicz Z, Bouffler S, Ahmed I, Abd-Alhameed R, Excell P, Hodzic V, Davis C, Gammon R, Balzano Q. Absence of nonlinear responses in cells and tissues exposed to RF energy at mobile phone frequencies using a doubly resonant cavity. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010 Oct;31(7):556-565.
Cuccurazzu B, Leone L, Podda MV, Piacentini R, RipoliC, Azzena GB, Grassi C. Exposure to extremely low-frequency (50 Hz) electromagnetic fields enhances adult hippocampal neurogenesis in C57BL/6 mice. Exp Neurol. 2010 Nov;226(1):173-82.
Belyaev I. Dependence of non-thermal biological effects of microwaves on physical and biological variables: implications for reproducibility and safety standards. Eur. J. Oncol.- Library 2010;54:187-218.
Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. The effect of exposure duration on the biological activity of mobile telephony radiation. Mut Res. 2010;699:17-22.
Arendash GW, Sanchez-Ramos J, Mori T, Mamcarz M, Lin X, Runfeldt M, Wang L, Zhang G, Sava V, Tan J, Cao C. Electromagnetic field treatment protects against and reverses cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Alzheimer Dis. 2010;19(1):191-210.
Conso F, Dargone MA, Asselain D, Choudat D. L’intolérance environnementale Idiopathique (sensibilité chimique multiple). Environnement, Risques et Santé. 2010;9(5):393-400.
Akin C, Valent P, Metcalfe DD. Mast cell activation syndrome: Proposed diagnostic criteria. J Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010 12 6:1099-1104.
Ozgur E, Güler G, Seyhan N. Mobile phone radiation-induced free radical damage in the liver is inhibited by the antioxidants n-acetyl cysteine and epigallocatechin-gallate. Int J Radiat Biol 2010;86(11):935-945.
Akdag MZ, Dasdag S, Ulukaya E, Uzunlar AK, Kurt MA, Taskin A. Effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on caspase activities and oxidative stress values in rat brain. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2010;138(1-3):238-249.
Mannerling AC, Simko M, Mild KH, Mattson MO. Effects of 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on superoxide radical anion formation and HSP70 induction in human K562 cells. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010;49:731-741.
Sonmez OF, Odaci E, Bas O, Kaplan S. Purkinje cell number decreases in the adult female rat cerebellum following exposure to 90 MHz electromagnetic fields. Brain Res. 2010;1356:95-101.
Hao Y, Yang X, Chen C, Yuan-Wang, Wang X, Li M, Yu Z. STAT3 signaling pathway is involved in the activation of microglia induced by 2.45 GHz electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86(1):27-36.
Ammari M, Gamez C, Lecomte A, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, [de Seze R]. GFAP expression in the rat brain following sub-chronic exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field signal. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86(5):367-375.
Maskey D, Kim M, Aryal B, Pradhan J, Choi I-Y, Park K-S, Son T, Hong S-Y, Kim SB, Kim HG, Kim MJ. Effect of 835 MHz radiofrequency radiation exposure on calcium binding proteins in the hippocampus of the mouse brain. Brain Res. 2010;1313:232-241.
Maskey D, Pradhan J, Aryal B, Lee CM, Choi IY, Park KS, Kim SB, Kim HG, Kim MJ. Chronic 835 MHz radiofrequency exposure to mice hippocampus alters the distribution of calbindin and GFAP immunoreactivity. Brain Res. 2010;1346:237-246.
Morabito C, Guarnieri S, Fano G, Mariggio MA. Effects of Acute and Chronic Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on PC12 Cells during Neuronal Differentiation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2010;26:947-958.
Udroiu I, Giuliani L, Leradi LA. Genetoxic properties of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Eur J Oncol. 2010;5:123-134.
Kim J, Ha CS, Lee HJ, Song K. Repetitive exposure to a 60 Hz time-varying magnetic field induces DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2010;400:739-744.
Franzellitti S, Valbonesi P, Ciancaglini N, Biondi C, Contin A, Bersani F, Fabbri E. Transient DNA damage induced by high-frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM 1.8 GHz) in the human trophoblast HTR-8/SVneo cell line evaluated with the alkaline comet assay. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 2010:683(1-2):35-42.
Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Bhat PG, Mailankot M. Effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiations (RF-EMR) on passive avoidance behavior and hippocampal morphology in Wistar rats. Ups J Med Sci. 2010;115(2):91-96.
Johansson, A.; Nordin, S.; Heiden, M.; Sandström, M. Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. J. Psychosom. Res. 2010, 68, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Röösli, M.; Mohler, E.; Frei, P. Sense and sensibility in the context of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure. C. R. Phys. 2010, 11, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Stam R. Electromagnetic fields and the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res Rev. 2010;65:80-97. Doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.001.
Une nouvelle étude met en garde contre les risques liés aux émissions et suggère que les tours soient éloignées des maisons. 2010.
Alzheimer’s Association. 2011 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Mar;7(2):208-244.
Blank M, Goodman R. DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Apr;87:409-415.
Dragicevic N, Bradshaw PC, Mamcarz M, Lin X, Wang L, Cao C, Arendash GW. Long-term electromagnetic field treatment enhances brain mitochondrial function of both Alzheimer’s transgenic mice and normal mice: a mechanism for electromagnetic field-induced cognitive benefit? Neuroscience. 2011 Jun 30;185:135-149.
Dode AC, Leao MM, Tejo Fde A, Gomes AC, Dode DC, Dode MC, Moreira CW, Condessa VA, Albinatti C, Caiaffa WT. Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):3649-3665.
Hareuveny R, Eliyahu I, Luria R, Meiran N, Margaliot M. Cognitive effects of cellular phones: a possible role of non-radiofrequency radiation factors. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Oct;32(7):585-588.
Del Giudice E, Stefanini P, Tedeschi A, Vitiello G. The interplay of biomolecules and water at the origin of the active behavior of living organisms. J Phys Conf Ser. 2011;329.012011.
Trillo MA, Cid MA, Martinez MA, Page JE, Esteban J, Ubeda A. Cystostatic response of NB69 cells to weak pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011;32(5):340-350.
Esmekaya MA, Ozer C, Seyhan N. 900 MHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative stress on heart, lung, testis and liver tissues. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2011;30:84-89.
Aydin B, Akar A. Effects of a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on oxidative stress parameters in rat lymphoid organs, polymorphonuclear leukocytes and plasma. Arch Med Res. 2011;42(4):261-267.
Blank M, Goodman R. Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology. 2011;16:71-78.
Fragopoulou AF, Samara A, Antonelou MH, Xanthopoulou A, Papadopoulou A, Vougas K, et al. Brain proteome response following whole body exposure of mice to mobile phone or wireless DECT base radiation. Electromagnetic Biol Med. 2011;31:250-274.
McCarty, D.E.; Carrubba, S.; Chesson, A.L.; Frilot, C.; Gonzalez-Toledo, E.; Marino, A.A. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Evidence for a Novel Neurological Syndrome. Int. J. Neurosci. 2011, 121, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Avendano C, Mata A, Sanchez Sarmiento CA, Doncel GF. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm mobility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):39-45.
Étude « Hypersensibilité » attribuée aux champs électromagnétiques : étude clinique. Février 2012. https://www.radiofrequences.gouv.fr/spip.php?article102.
Gandhi OP, Morgan LL, de Salles AA, Han YY, Herberman RB, Davis DL. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Electroman Biol Med. 2012 Mar;31(1):34-51.
La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: areview of the literature. J. Androl. 2012 May-June;33(3):350-356.
Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Cell phone use and behavioral problems in young children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jun;66(6):524-529.
Milton Zaret an « Early Prophet » of Microwave Hazards, Dies at 91, Microwave News, 5 juin 2012, www.microwavenews.com/news-center/milton-zaret-early-prophet-microwave-hazards-dies-91
Arendash GW, Mori T, Dorsey M, Gonzalez R, Tajiri N, Borlongan C. Electromagnetic treatment to old Alzheimer’s mice reverses -amyloid deposition, modifies cerebral blood flow, and provides selected cognitive benefit. PloS One. 2012;7(4):e35751.
Yang L, Hao D, Wang M, Zeng Y, Wu S, Zeng Y. Cellular neoplastic transformation induced by 916 MHz microwave radiation. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012 Aug;32(6):1039-1046.
Yang XS, He G-L, Hao Y-T, et al. Exposure to 2.45 GHz electromagnetic fields elicits an HSP-related stress response in rat hippocampus. Brain Res Bull. 2012;88:371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.04.002.
Behari J. Rajamani P. Electromagnetic Field Exposure Effects (ELF-EMF and RFR); on Fertility and Reproduction. Bioinitiative Report. 2012 Nov; Section 18.
Soderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Use of wireless phones and risk of salivary gland tumours: a case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012 Nov;21(6):576-579.
Megha K, Deshmukh PS, Banerjee BD, Tripathi AK, Abegaonkar MP. Microwave radiation induced oxidative stress, cognitive impairment and inflammation in brain of Fischer rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 2012 Dec;50(12):889-896.
Sly JL, Carpenter DO. Special vulnerability of children to environmental exposures. Rev Environ Health. 2012;27(4):151-157.
Aldad TS, Gan G, Gao XB, Taylor HS. Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 MHz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Sci Rep. 2012;2:312.
BioInitiative Report: A Rational for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation. www.bioinitiative.org
Reflex, ou REFLEX-Study, ou Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards From Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods, est un rapport de recherche, financé par 7 états européens et dirigé par le professeur Franz Adlkofer. http://www.itis.ethz.ch/assets/Downloads/Papers-Reports/Reports/REFLEXFinal-Report171104.pdf.
Bouji M, Lecomte A, Hode Y, de Seze R, Villégier AS. Effects of 900 MHz radiofrequency on corticosterone, emotional memory and neuroinflammation in middle-aged rats. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(6):444-451.
Kato, Y.; Johansson, O. Reported functional impairments of electrohypersensitive Japanese: A questionnaire survey. Pathophysiology 2012, 19, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Baliatsas C, Van Kamp I, Lebret E, Rubin GJ. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): a systematic review of identifying criteria. BMC Public Health. 2012;12: 643. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-643.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Letter from the American Academy of Pediatrics to the FCC Regarding Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Standards. 29 August 2013. [online].
Deshmukh PS, Megha K, Banerjee BD, Ahmed RS, Chandna S, Abegaonkar MP, Tripathi AK. Detection of Low Level Microwave Radiation Induced Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage Vis-a-vis Genetoxicity in Brain of Fischer Rats. Toxicol Int. 2013 Jan;20(1):19-24.
Rolland M, Le Moal J, Wagner V, Royere D, and De Mouzon J. Decline in 1967 semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 men close to general 1968 population between 1989 and 2005 in Europe. Human Reprod 2013; 28: 462-470.
Szmigielski S. Reaction of the immune system to low-level RF/MW exposures. Sci Total Env. 2013;454-455;393-400.
Havas M, Marrongelle J. Replication of heart rate variability provocation study with 2.4-GHz cordless phone confirms original findings. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013 Jun;32(2):253-266.
Havas M, Marrongelle J. Radiation from wireless technology affects the blood, the heart, and the autonomic nervous system. Rev Environ Health. 2013; 28(2-3):75-84.
Herbert MR, Sage C. Autism and EMF? Plausibility of pathological link – Part I. Pathophysiology. 2013 Jun;20(3):191-209.
Herbert MR, Sage C. Autism and EMF? Plausibility of pathological link – Part II. Pathophysiology. 2013 Jun;20(3):211-234.
Pelletier A, Delanaud S, Décima P, Thuroczy G, de Seze R, Cerri M, Bach V, Libert JP, Loos N. Effects of chronic exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on energy balance in developing rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 May;20(5):2735-2746.
Szmigielski S. Reaction of the immune system to low-level RF/MW exposures. Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jun 1;454-455:393-400.
Pall ML. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial ir adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Aug;17(8):958-965.
Pall, M.L. Elevated nitric oxide/peroxynitrite theory of multiple chemical sensitivity: Central role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the sensitivity mechanism. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 111, 1461–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ozorak A, Naziroglu M, Çelik O, Yüksel M, Ozçelik D, Ozkaya MO, Çetin H, Kahya MC, Kose SA. Wi Fi (2.45 GHz) – and mobile phone (900 and 1800 MHz) – induced risks on oxidative stress and elements in kidney and testis of rats during pregnancy and the development of offspring. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013 Dec;156(1-3):221-229.
Balassa T, Varro P, Elek S, Drozdovszky O, Szemerszky R, Vilagi I, Bardos G. Changes in synaptic efficacy in rat brain slices following extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure at embryonic and early postnatal age. Int. J Dev Neurosci. 2013 Dec;31(8):724-730.
Byun YH, Ha M, Kwon HJ, Hong YC, Leem JH, Sakong J, Kim SY, Lee CG, Kang D, Choi HD, Kim N. Mobile phone use, blood lead levels, and attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms in children: A longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59742.
Burlaka A, Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, Lukin S, Polishuk V, Tsemistrenko S, Yakimenko I. Overproduction of free radical species in embryonal cells exposed to low intensity radiofrequency radiation. Exp Oncol. 2013;35:219-225.
Akdag MZ, Dasdag S, Uzunlar AK, Ulukaya E, Oral AY, Çelik N, Aksen F. Safe and long-term exposure, and oxidative stress? Int J Radiat Biol. 2013;89(12):1053-1060.
Akdag MZ, Dasdag S, Cakir DU, Yokus B, Kizil M. Do 100 and 500 üT ELF magnetic fields alter beta-amyloid protein, protein carbonyl and malondialdehyde in rat brains? Electromagn Biol Med. 2013;32(3):363-372.
Alti Sekeroglu Z, Akar A, Sekeroglu V. Evaluation of the cytogenotoxic damage in immature and mature rats exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013;89(11):985-992.
Bohr H, Bohr J. Microwave enhanced kinetics observed in ORD studies of a protein. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013;21:68-72.
Beyer C, Christen P, Jelesarov I, Frohlich J. Experimental system for realtime assessment of potential changes in protein conformation induced by electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013;34:419-428.
Aboul Ezz HS, Khadrawy YA, Ahmed NA, Radwan NM, El Bakry MM. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone on the levels of monoamine neurotransmitters in four different areas of rat brain. Eur Rev Med Pharmaco. 2013;17:1782-1788.
WHO (World Health Organization). Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Mobile Phones (October 2014); WHO Updated Fact Sheet No. 193; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
Nordin, S.; Neely, G.; Olsson, D.; Sandström, M. Odor and noise intolerance in persons with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 8794–8805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ma Q, Deng P, Zhu G, Liu C, Zhang L, Zhou Z, L ? L vuo X, Li M, Zhong M, Yu Z, Chen C, Zhang Y. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields affect transcript levels of neuronal differentiation-related genes in embryonic neural stem cells. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90041.
Rocha SM, Pires J, Esteves M, Baltazar G, Bernardino L. Histamine:a new immunomodulatory player in the neuronglia crosstalk. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014 Apr 30;8:120.
Leone L, Fusco S, Mastrodonato A, Piacentini R, Barbati SA, Zaffina S, Pani G, Podda MV, Grassi C. Epigenetic modulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis by extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Mol Neurobiol. 2014 Jun;49(3):1472-1486.
Reale M, Kamal MA, Patruno A, Costantini E, D’Angelo C, Pesce M, Greig NH. Neuronal Cellular Responses to Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure: Implications Regarding Oxidative Stress and Neurodegeneration. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e104973.
Roberts JA, Yaya LH, Manolis C. The invisible addiction: cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. J Behav Addict. 2014 Dec;3(3):254-265.
Dong H, Zhang X, Qian Y. Mast cells and neuroinflammation. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2014 Dec 21;20:200-206.
Roshangar L, Hamdi BA, Khaki AA, Rad JS, Soleimani-Rad S. Effect of low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure on oocyte differentiation and follicular development. Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:76.
Maschi JP. Sclérose en plaques et pollution électromagnétique. La théorie environnementale d’une maladie neurologique. Résurgence. Marco Pietteur éditeur, 2014.
McGill JJ and Agarwall A. The impact of cell phone, laptop computer, and microwave oven usage on male fertility. In: Male infertility: A Complete Guide to Lifestyle and Environmental Factors. S. S. du Plessis et al., Eds Springer Science business Media, New York. 2014. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1040-3_11.
Luukkonen J, Liimatainen A, Juutilainen J, Naarala J. Induction of genomic instability, oxidative processes, and mitochondrial activity by 50 Hz magnetic fields in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Mutat Res. 2014;760:33-41.
Baliatsas, C.; van Kamp, I.; Hooiveld, M.; Yzermans, J.; Lebret, E. Comparing non-specific physical symptoms in environmentally sensitive patients: Prevalence, duration, functional status and illness behavior. J. Psychosom. Res. 2014, 76, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
van Dongen, D.; Smid, T.; Timmermans, D.R. Symptom attribution and risk perception in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance to electromagnetic fields and in the general population. Perspect. Public Health 2014, 134, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kesari KK, Meena R, Nirala J, Kumar J, Verma HN. Effect of 3G cell phone exposure with computer controlled 2-D stepper motor on non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway in rat brain. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014;68:347–358. Doi: 10.1007/s12013-013-9715-4.
Havas M. Electrosmog and electrosensitivity: What doctors need to know to help their patients heal. Anti-Aging Therapeutics Volume XV, Klatz R and R Goldman (Eds), A4M, Chicago, IL. 2014.
Halgamuge MN, Yak SK, Eberhardt JL. Reduced Growth of Soybean Seedlings after Exposure to Weak Microwave Radiation from GSM 900 mobile Phone and Base Station. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015 Feb;36(2):87-95.
Sangun O, Dundar B, Darici H, Comlekci S, Doguc DK, Celik S. The effects of long-term exposure to a 2450 MHz electromagnetic field on growth and pubertal development in female Wistar rats. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015 Mar;34(1):63-71.
Zhang Y, Li Z, Gao Y, Zhang C. Effects of fetal microwave radiation exposure on offspring behavior in mice. J Radiat Res. 2015 Mar;56(2):261-268.
Mahmoudabadi FS, Ziaei S, Firoozabadi M, Kazemnejab A. Use of mobile phone during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2015 Apr 21;13:34.
Furtado-Filho OV, Borba JB, Maraschin T, Souza LM, Henriques JA, Moreira JC, Saffi J. Effects of chronic exposure to 950 MHz ultra-high-frequency electromagnetic radiation on reactive oxygen species metabolism in the right and left cerebral cortex of young rats of different ages. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015;91(11):891-897.
Lenhart A, Page D. Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview : Smartphones facilitate shifts in communication landscape for teens. Pew Research Center study. Apr 2015.
Funk RH. Endogenous electric fields as guiding cue for cell migration. Front Physiol, 2015 May 13;6:143.
5th Paris Appeal Congress – Environmental idiopathic intolerance: what role for EMFs and multiple chemical? Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) – 18th of May, 2015. Royal Academy of Medecine, Belgium. Http://appel-de-paris.com.
« Reviews on Environmental Health » : Special Issue: Idiopathic environmental intolerance. (Issue Editor: David Carpenter). Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):207-337.
Markov M, Grigoriev Y. Protect children from EMF. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015 Sep;34(3):251-256.
Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Schaub MP. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict. 2015 Dec;4(4):299-307.
Qiu C, Shivacharan RS, Zhang M, Durand DM. Can Neural Activity Propagate by Endogenous Electrical Field? J Neurosci. 2015 Dec 2;35(48):15800-15811.
Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O, Carlo GL. Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies. Biomed Res Int. 2015:607053.
Gandhi OMP. Yes the children are more exposed to radiofrequency energy from mobile telephones than adults. IEEE Access 2015;3:985-988.
Belpomme D, Campagnac C, Irigaray P. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. Rev Environ Health. 2015 Dec 1;30(4):251-271.[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ledoigt G, Sta C, Goujon E, Souguir D, El Ferjani E. Synergistic health effects between chemical pollutants and electromagnetic fields. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):305-309.
Furtado-Filho OV, Borba JB, Maraschin T, Souza LM, Henriques JA, Moreira JC, Saffi J. Effects of chronic exposure to 950 MHz ultra-high-frequency electromagnetic radiation on reactive oxygen species metabolism in the right and left cerebral cortex of young rats of different ages. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015;91(11):891-897.
De Luca C, Gugliandolo A, Calabro C, Curro M, lentile R, Raskovic D, Korkina L, Caccamo D. Role of polymorphisms of inducible nitric oxide synthase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in idiopathic environmental intolerances. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:245308.
Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O, Carlo JL. Polarization: A Key Difference between Manmade and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14914;doi:10. 1038/srep14914.
Ozgur E, Sahin D, Tomruk A, Guler G, Sepici Dinçel A, Altan N, Seyhan N. The effects of N-acetylcysteine and epigallocatechin-3-gallate on liver tissue protein oxidation and antioxidant enzyme levels after the exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2015;91(2):187-193.
Patruno A, Tabrez S, Pesce M, Shakil S, Kamal MA, Reale M. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on catalase, cytochrome P450 and nitric oxide synthase in erythro-leukemic cells. Life Sci. 2015;121:117-123.
Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Erdal ME, Erdal N, Av, OL, Ay ME, et al. Effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on microRNA expression in brain tissue. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015;91:555-561.
Xiong, L.; Sun, C.F.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Y.B.; Wang, L.F.; Zuo, H.Y.; Wang, S.M.; Zhou, H.M.; Xu, X.P.; Dong, J.; et al. Microwave exposure impairs synaptic plasticity in the rat hippocampus and PC12 cells through over-activation of the NMDA receptor signaling pathway. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2015, 28, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
Pall ML. Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.08.001
Maher BA, Ahmed IA, Karloukovski V, MacLaren DA, Foulds PG, Allsop D, Mann DM, Torres-Jardon R, Calderon-Garciduenas L. Magnetite pollution nanoparticles in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016 Sep 27;113(39):10797-10801.
Grehl S, Martina D, Goyenvalle C, Deng ZD, Rodger J, Sherrard RM. In vitro Magnetic Stimulation: A Simple Stimulation Device to Deliver Defined Low Intensity Electromagnetic Fields. Front Neural Circuits. 2016 Nov 3;10:85.
Guerriero F, Ricevuti G. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation modulates autoimmunity and immune responses: a possible immuno-modulatory therapeutic effect in neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen Res. 2016 Dec;11(12):1888-1895.
Starkey SJ. Inaccurate official assessment of radiofrequency safety by the Advisory Group on Non-ionizing Radiation. Rev Environ Health. 2016 Dec 1;31(4):493-503.
Carter B, Rees P, Hale L, Bhattacharjee D, Paradkar MS. Association between portable screen-based media device access or use and sleep outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;170(12):1202-1208.
Sudan M, Olsen J, Arah OA, Obel C, Kheifets L. Prospective cohort analysis of cellphone use and emotional and behavioural difficulties in children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Dec;70(12):1207-1213.
Tang R, Xu Y, Ma F, Ren J, Shen S, Du Y, Hou Y, Wang T. Extremely low frequency magnetic fields regulate differentiation of regulatory T cells: Potential role for ROS-mediated inhibition on AKT. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016;37:89-98.
Feng B, Dai A, Chen L, Fu Y, Sun W. NADPH oxidase-produced superoxide mediated a 50 Hz magnetic field-induced epidermal growth factor receptor clustering. Int J Radiat Biol. 2016;92:596-602.
Dieudonné M. Does electromagnetic hypersensitivity originate from nocebo responses? Indications from a qualitative study. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016;37:14-24.
Berthelot JM. Is electromagnetic hypersensitivity entirely ascribable to nocebo effects? Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83(2):121-123.
Hecht K. Health Implications of Long-term Exposure to Electrosmog, Effects of Wireless Communication Technologies, Brochure n°6, 2016 (Analyse fondée sur le dépouillement des archives de la médecine du travail russe ayant assuré un suivi systématique des salariés exposés aux champs électromagnétiques).
Belyaev I. Duration of exposure and dose in assessing nonthermal biological effects of microwaves. In: Dosimetry in Bioelectromagnetics. CRC Press, 2017;171-184.
Vecchio FD, de Jenlis A, Person C, de Seze R, Delanaud S, Bach V, Pelletier A. Behavioral effects of low intensity radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Programme national santé environnement et santé travail Radiofréquences & santé (Paris, 17 mai 2017).
Pelletier A. Réponses physiologiques d’adaptation ou d’évitement du rat juvénile exposé aux ondes radiofréquences type antenne relais. Rencontres scientifiques de l’ANSES- Restitution scientifiques de L’ANSES- Restitution du Programme national de recherche environnement santé travail (PNREST) (Paris, 17 mai 2017).
Eghlidospour M, Ghanbari A, Mortazavi SMJ, Azari H. Effects of radiofrequency exposure emitted from a GSM mobile phone on proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of neural stem cells. Anat Cell Biol. 2017 Jun;50(2):115-123.
Birks L, Guxens M, Papadopoulos E, Alexander J, Ballester F, Estarlich M, et al. Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child behavioral problems in five birth cohorts. Environ Int. 2017 Jul;104:122-131.
Choi KH, Ha M, Ha EH, Park H, Kim Y, Hong YC, et al. Neurodevelopment for the first three years following prenatal mobile phone use, radiofrequency radiation and lead exposure. Environ Res. 2017 Jul;156:810-817.
Hendriksen E, van Bergeijk D, Oosting RS, Redegeld FA. Mast cells in neuroinflammation and brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Aug;79:119-133.
Hardell L. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack (Review). Int J Oncol. 2017 Aug;51(2):405-413.
Doyon PR, Johansson O. Electromagnetic fields may act via calcineurin inhibition to suppress immunity, thereby increasing risk for opportunistic infection: Conceivable mechanisms of action. Med Hypotheses. 2017 Sep;106:71-87.
Heuser, G.; Heuser, S.A. Functional brain MRI in patients complaining of electrohypersensitivity after long term exposure to electromagnetic fields. Rev. Environ. Health 2017, 32, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2017-0014
Levine H, Jorgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Mindlis I, Pinotti R, Swan SH. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):643-659.
Li DK, Chen H, Ferber JR, Odouli R, Quesenberry C. Exposure to magnetic field non-ionizing radiation and the risk of miscarriage: A prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 13;7(1):17541.
Panagopoulos DJ. Mobile Telephony Radiation Effects on Insect Ovarian Cells. The Necessity for Real Exposures Bioactivity Assessment. The key role of Polarization, and the Ion Forced – Oscillation Mechanism. In CD Geddes (Ed.), Microwave Effects on DNA and Proteins, Ed. Springer 2017.
Jeong WY, Kim JB, Kim HJ, Kim CW. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field promotes astrocytic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by modulating SIRT1 expression. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2017;81:1356-1362.
Shahin S, Banerjee S, Swarup V, Singh SP, Chaturvedi CM. 2.45 GHz microwave radiation impairs hippocampal learning and spatial memory: involvement of local stress mechanism induced suppression of iGluR/ERK/CREB signaling. Toxicol Sci. 2017;161:349-374.
Aubineau P. Project COMOBIO COmmunications MObiles et BIOlogie- Sous-projet 6 : Barrière hémato-encéphalique et migraine chez le rat. Https://electroallergique.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/comobio_sp6.pdf
Sage C, Burgio E. Electromagnetic fields, pulsed radiofrequency radiation, and epigenetics: how wireless technologies may affect childhood development. Child Dev. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12824.
Belyaev I. Duration of Exposure and Dose in Assessing Nonthermal Biological Effects of Microwaves. In book: Dosimetry in Bioelectromagnetics. CRC Press, 2017. Pp 171-184.
Huang PC, Cheng MT, Guo HR. Representative survey on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields in Taiwan and comparison with the international literature. Environ Health. Jan 2018; https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-018-0351 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29334987
Avis et rapport de l’ANSES. Hypersensibilité électromagnétique ou intolérance environnementale idiopathique attribuée aux champs électromagnétiques. Saisine n°2011-SA-0150, Mars 2018 : https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/AP2011SA0150Ra. Pdf
Isakovic J, Dobbs-Dixon I, Chaudhury D, Mitrecic D. Modeling of inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields in the nervous system: a novel paradigm in understanding cell interactions, disease etiology and therapy. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 27;8(1):12909.
Sherrand RM, Morellini N, Jourdan N, El-Esawi M, Arthaut LD, Niessner C, Rouyer F, Klarsfeld A, Doulazmi M, Witczak J, d’Harlingue A, Mariani J, Mclure I, Martino CF, Ahmad M. Low-intensity electromagnetic fields induce human cryptochrome to modulate intracellular reactive oxygen species. PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 2;16(10):e2006229.
EMFcall: Appel pour des valeurs limites d’exposition réellement protectrices dans le domaine des champs électromagnétiques (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Oct 2018 : https://www.emfcall.org/
Pall M. Response to 2018 ICNIRP Draft Guidelines and Appendices on Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). 8 Oct 2018. http://www.5gappeal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/icnirp_2018_pall.pdf
Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Ernesto Burgio E, Carpenter DO. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of non-ionizing radiation: an international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018 Nov;242 (PtA):643-658.
Jalilian H, Teshnizi SH, Roosli M, Neghab M. Occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and risk of Alzeimer disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurotoxicology. 2018 Dec;69:242-252.
Irigaray, P.; Caccamo, D.; Belpomme, D. Oxidative stress in electrohypersensitivity self-reporting patients: Results of a prospective in vivo investigation with comprehensive molecular analysis. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 1885–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Irigaray P., Garrel C., Houssay C., Mantello P., Belpomme D. Beneficial effects of a Fermented Papaya Preparation for the treatment of electrohypersensitivity self-reporting patients: results of a phase I-II clinical trial with special reference to cerebral pulsation measurement and oxidative stress analysis. FFHD. 2018; 8(2):122-144. DOI: 10.31989/ffhd.v8i2.406
Irigaray P, Lebar P, Belpomme D. How ultrasonic cerebral tomosphygmography can contribute to the diagnosis of electrohypersensitivity. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;6:143.
Santini SJ, Cordone V, Falone S, Mijit M, Tatone C, Amicarelli F and Di Emidio G. Role of Mitochondria in the Oxidative Stress Induced by Electromagnetic Fields: Focus on Reproductive Systems. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018: 5076271.
Pall M. 5G: Great risk for EU, US and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF). Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them. 2018. https://www.emf-sa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/pall-to-eu-on-5g-harm-march-2018.pdf
En français : La 5G : risques majeurs sur la santé des populations en Union Européenne, aux USA, et à l’international ! Des preuves convaincantes de huit différents effets très nocifs de l’exposition aux champs électromagnétiques, et les mécanismes associés. http://ekladata.com/XC3sBuO39bUEIBvwdVz9L45jt6c/Traduction-du-texte-de-Martin-Pall_2018_04.pdf
Smith-Roe SL, Wyde ME, Stout MD, Winters JW, Hobbs CA, Shepard KG, Green AS, Kissing GE, Shockley KR, Tice RR, Bucher JR, Witt KL. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2019 Oct 21. doi:10.1002/em.2234.
Hardell L, Carlberg M. Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicology and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and in mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz. Int J Oncol. 2019 Jan;54(1):111-127.
Henry Lai. Percent Comparison Showing Effect vs No Effect in Comet Assay and Free Radical (Oxidative Effects) Studies (RFR and Static Field/ELF-EMF). In BioInitiative Report Research Summaries Updates, Apr 2019. https://bioInitiative.org/research-summaries/
Lintermans J, Vanderheyden JE. L’autisme, une pathologie victime de l’environnement moderne ? Où en est-on en 2019 ? Neurone 2019;24(9):60-64.
Gandhi OP. Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When Touching the Body. IEEE Access. 2019;7:47050-47052.
Smith-Roe SL, Wyde ME, Stout MD, Winters JW, Hobbs CA, Shepard KG, Green AS, Kissing GE, Shockley KR, Tice RR, Bucher JR, Witt KL. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of the cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020 Feb;61(2):276-290.
Belpomme D, Irigaray P. Electrohypersensitivity as a Newly Identified and Characterized Neurologic Pathological Disorder: How to Diagnose, Treat, and Prevent it. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 11;21(6):1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hardell L, Nyberg R. Appears that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation. Mol Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar;12(3):247-257.
Li ZQ, Zhang Y, Wan YM, Zhou Q, Liu C, Wu HX, Mu YZ, He YF, Rauniyar R, Wu XN. Testing of behavioral and cognitive development in rats after prenatal exposure to 1800 and 2400 MHz radiofrequency fields. J Radiat Res. 2020 Mar 23;61(2):197-206.
Hardell L, Carlberg M. Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest. Oncol Lett. 2020 Oct;20(4):15.
Bouji M, Lecomte A, Gamez C, Blazy K, Villégier AS. Impact of Cerebral Radiofrequency Exposures On Oxidative Stress and Corticosterone in a Rat Model of Alzeimer’s Disease. J Alzeimers Dis. 2020;73(2):467-476.
Greco F. Technical Assessment of Ultrasonic Cerebral Tomosphygmography and New Scientific Evaluation of Its Clinical Interest for the Diagnosis of Electrohypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. Diagnostics 2020,10,427.
Belpomme D., Irigaray P. « L’électrohypersensibilité en tant que trouble pathologique neurologique nouvellement identifié et caractérisé : comment le diagnostiquer, le traiter et le prévenir », 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139347/
Traduction française : https://www.cjoint.com/c/JFnss01rozG
Extraits :
« … ces patients [malades atteints d’EHS] présentent objectivement une véritable pathologie somatique et non comme l’affirment certains, une pathologie d’origine purement psychologique ».
« … l’EHS se caractérise par l’apparition de symptômes neurologiques …maux de tête, … acouphènes, … hyperacousie, … vertiges, … troubles de l’équilibre, anomalies de la sensibilité superficielle et/ou profonde, … fibromyalgie, … dysfonctionnement neurovégétatif, … réduction des capacités cognitives, … perte de mémoire immédiate, … déficit d’attention et de concentration, … éventuellement épisodes de désorientation spatio-temporelle. … associées à une triade symptomatiques … d’insomnie, de fatigue chronique, et de tendance dépressive … en plus d’une labilité émotionnelle et parfois d’irritabilité… un signe de Romberg (test objectif de posture) dans 5% des cas … lésions cutanées dans 16% des cas ».
« Dans l’ensemble, bien que la littérature scientifique considère que nombre de ces symptômes sont non-spécifiques, le tableau clinique observé fait état de leur association et d’une fréquence caractéristique, suggérant fortement que l’EHS peut en fait être reconnue et identifiée comme une pathologie neurologique typique, comme … pour la MCS et l’association EHS-MCS ».
« … l’EHS, la MCS et l’association EHS-MCS peuvent avoir dans leur genèse un mécanisme physiopathologique … impliquant une inflammation de bas grade »
« … l’ouverture de la barrière hémato-encéphalique … réponse auto-immune contre la substance blanche du système nerveux … conséquence de l’apparition d’un stress oxydatif/nitrosatif induit par les champs électromagnétiques ou les produits chimiques »
« … diminution de biodisponibilité métabolique de la mélatonine en raison de l’augmentation de la consommation et de l’utilisation de celle-ci en tant que piégeur de radicaux libres »
« … l’EHS est associé à différents profils anormaux des neurotransmetteurs »
« … chez les … EHS une diminution de l’indice de pulsatilité moyen de l’une voire des deux artères cérébrales moyennes »
« … [dans les] lobes temporaux, … une diminution significative de l’indice pulsométrique moyen dans la zone capsulo-thalamique, qui correspond au système limbique et au thalamus »
« … le BBF [flux sanguin cérébral] dans les artères cérébrales moyennes peut être anormal ».
« … ce qui peut mener à un BBF [flux sanguin cérébral] diminué et/ou un métabolisme diminué dans les lobes pré-frontaux »
« … taux d’histamine élevé dans le sang »
« … augmentation des protéines S100 B et des biomarqueurs de stress oxydant »
« … les … EHS présentent souvent un important déficit … en vitamine D et en zinc … »
« … l’EHS peut évoluer vers une maladie neurodégénérative … »
« … l’EHS et la MCS semblent être associés à un état pathologique neurologique irréversible … »
« … ces affections ne peuvent pas être considérées comme de simples altérations fonctionnelles, mais … comme de véritables affections pathologiques … »
« … extension possible de la neuro-inflammation dans les lobes frontaux et possiblement dans l’hypothalamus ».
« … le terme d’hypersensibilité … caractérisé par une diminution du seuil de tolérance environnementale à un tel point critique que les patients deviennent intolérants aux facteurs de stress de faible intensité … comme … chez les … allergiques ».
« … les patients deviennent intolérants à de faibles intensités de CEM [champs électromagnétiques] ».
« … les … EHS peuvent être sensibles à certaines fréquences sans l’être nécessairement à d’autres … »
« … les effets biologiques … chez les … EHS … dus aux champs électromagnétiques … pulsés et polarisés émis par les technologies électriques ou électromagnétiques sans fil ».
« … en moyenne environ 3 % à 5 % de la population … sont en réalité aujourd’hui atteints d’EHS dans le monde ».
« … l’EHS doit donc être désormais reconnue comme une nouvelle affection neurologique identifiée et caractérisée au plan physiopathologique. Comme l’EHS est devenue un véritable fléau sanitaire frappant des millions de personnes dans le monde, cette affection devrait être reconnue comme telle par l’OMS, et donc inclue dans la classification internationale des maladies (CIM) ».
Belpomme D., Carlo G.L., Irigaray P., Carpenter D.O., Hardell L., Kundi M., Belyaev I., Havas, M., Adlkofer F., Heuser G. et al. The critical importance of molecular biomarkers and imaging in the study of electrohypersensitivity. A scientific consensus international report. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Belpomme, D.; Irigaray, P. Why electrohypersensitivity and related symptoms are caused by non-ionizing man-made electromagnetic fields: An overview and medical assessment. Environmental Research. 2022, 212, 113374. [Google Scholar] [Pubmed] [Sciencedirect] doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113374
« Pourquoi l’électrohypersensibilité et les symptômes associés sont causés par les champs électromagnétiques artificiels non ionisants : un aperçu et une évaluation médicale ».
Extraits : Principaux points : - L'électrohypersensibilité est causée par les champs électromagnétiques. -L'électrohypersensibilité est un trouble neurologique avec inflammation, stressoxydatif. - Ouverture de la barrière hémato-encéphalique et anomalies des neurotransmetteurs. – L’électrohypersensibilité doit être définie par la diminution du seuil de tolérance aux champs électromagnétiques cérébraux. « Résumé : Une grande partie de la controverse sur la cause de l’électrohypersensibilité (EHS) réside dans l’absence de critères cliniques et biologiques reconnus pour un diagnostic largement accepté. Cependant, il existe actuellement suffisamment de données pour que l’EHS soit reconnue comme un trouble pathologique neurologique nettement bien défini et objectivement caractérisé. Parce que nous avons montré que 1) l’EHS est fréquemment associée à une sensibilité chimique multiple (MCS) chez les patients EHS, et 2) que les deux troubles individualisés partagent un mécanisme physiopathologique commun pour l’apparition des symptômes ; il semble que l’EHS et la MCS puissent être identifiés comme un syndrome neurologique unique, quelle que soit leur origine causale. Dans cet aperçu, nous distinguons l’étiologie de l’EHS elle-même des causes environnementales qui déclenchent les changements physiopathologiques et les symptômes cliniques après l’apparition de l’EHS. Contrairement à des affirmations scientifiquement infondées, nous réfutons indubitablement l’hypothèse d’un effet nocebo pour expliquer la genèse de l’EHS et sa présentation. Nous réfutons également le concept erroné selon lequel l’EHS pourrait être réduite à une « déficience fonctionnelle » vague et non prouvée. Au contraire, nous montrons ici qu’il y a des changements physiopathologiques objectifs et des effets sur la santé induits par l’exposition aux champs électromagnétiques (CEM) chez les patients EHS et surtout chez les sujets sains, ce qui signifie que les CEM anthropiques non thermiques excessifs sont fortement nocifs pour la santé. Dans cet aperçu et cette évaluation médicale, nous nous concentrons sur les effets des fréquences extrêmement basses, des champs électromagnétiques radiofréquences et micro-ondes des communications sans fil. Nous discutons de la manière de mieux définir et caractériser l’EHS. En tenant compte des critères de causalité proposés par l’OMS, nous montrons que l’EHS est en fait associée de manière causale à une exposition accrue aux CEM d’origine humaine et, dans certains cas, aux produits chimiques environnementaux commercialisés. Nous appelons donc tous les gouvernements et les institutions de santé internationales, en particulier l’OMS, à considérer de toute urgence la peste pandémique croissante associée à l’EHS, et à reconnaître l’EHS comme une pathologie nouvelle principalement liée causalement aux CEM ».
Belpomme D, Irigaray P. Why scientifically unfounded and misleading claim should be dismissed to make true research progress in the acknowledgment of electrohypersensibility as a new worldwide emerging pathology. Rev Environ Health. 2021;37:303-305. Doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0104.
Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Yakymenko I, Chrousos GP, Champs électromagnétiques d’origine humaine : dysfonctionnement des canaux ioniques par oscillation forcée et voltage-dépendant, stress oxydatif et dommages à l’ADN. October 6, 2021. Inter. J. Oncology. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2021.5272
Résumé : L’exposition d’animaux/échantillons biologiques à des champs électromagnétiques (CEM) d’origine humaine, en particulier dans la bande de fréquences extrêmement basses (ELF) et dans la bande de fréquences micro-ondes/radio (RF) qui est toujours associée aux ELF, peut endommager l’ADN. Les dommages à l’ADN sont liés à la mort cellulaire, à la stérilité et à d’autres pathologies, dont le cancer. L’exposition aux ELF provenant de lignes électriques à haute tension et l’exposition aux RF complexes provenant d’antennes/appareils de communication sans fil sont liées à un risque accru de cancer. Presque tous les CEM RF d’origine humaine comprennent des composants ELF sous forme de modulation, d’impulsion et de variabilité aléatoire. Ainsi, en plus de la polarisation et de la cohérence, l’existence des ELF est une caractéristique commune à presque tous les CEM d’origine humaine. La présente étude examine les dommages à l’ADN et les effets connexes induits par les CEM d’origine humaine. Le mécanisme d’oscillation forcée des ions pour le déclenchement irrégulier des canaux ioniques voltage-dépendants sur les membranes cellulaires par des CEM polarisés/cohérents est décrit en détail. Le dysfonctionnement des canaux ioniques perturbe les concentrations ioniques intracellulaires, qui déterminent l’équilibre électrochimique et l’homéostasie de la cellule. La présente étude montre comment cela peut entraîner des dommages à l’ADN par surproduction d’espèces réactives de l’oxygène/de radicaux libres. Ainsi, une image complète est fournie de la manière dont l’exposition aux CEM d’origine humaine peut effectivement entraîner des dommages à l’ADN et des pathologies associées, y compris le cancer. De plus, il est suggéré que les effets biologiques non thermiques attribués aux CEM RF sont en fait dus à leurs composants ELF.
Belpomme D, Irigaray P. Why the psychogenic or psychosomatic theories for electrohypersensitivity causality should be abandoned, but not the hypothesis of a nocebo-associated symptom formation caused by electromagnetic fields conditioning in some patients. Environ Res. 2022;114839, Online ahead of print.
Belpomme D, Irigaray P. Electro-hypersensitivity as a Worldwide, Man-made Electromagnetic Pathology: A Review of the Medical Evidence. In Electromagnetic Fields of Wireless Communications: Biological and Health Effects, Panagopoulos Ed.; 2023, p. 297-367.
Belpomme D., Irigaray P. Combined Neurological Syndrome in Electrohypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A Clinical Study of 2018 Cases. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12(23):7421. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237421
En français : Syndrome neurologique combiné de l’électrohypersensibilité et de la sensibilité aux produits chimiques multiples : Une étude clinique de 2018 cas. Journal de Médecine Clinique, 2023, 12, 7421. https://www.artac.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/article-clinique-traduit.pdf
Greco, F.; Garnier, O.; Macioce, V.; Picot, M.C. Prevalence of Migraine Disease in Electrohypersensitive Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] doi: 10.3390/jcm12124092
Philippe Irigaray, Natalio Awaida, Dominique Belpomme. Biomarqueurs moléculaires de l’électrohypersensibilité et de la sensibilité chimique multiple : comment ils peuvent aider au diagnostic, au suivi des malades et à la compréhension étiopathologique. 2024. Société européenne de médecine : https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v 12i1.4771
En français : https://www.artac.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/article-biomarqueurs-traduit.pdf
R. R. Brown, B. Biebrich, Hypothèse : l’échographie peut documenter la formation dynamique de rouleaux in vivo due à l’exposition aux téléphones portables, Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 11 Feb. 2025 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1499499
Sonzogni, L. ; Al-Choboq, J. ; Combemale, P. ; Massardier-Pilonchéry, A. ; Bouchet, A. ; May, P. ; Doré, J.-F. ; Debouzy, J.-C. ; Bourguignon, M. ; Dréan, Y.L. ; et al. Les fibroblastes cutanés d’individus auto-diagnostiqués comme électrosensibles révèlent deux sous-ensembles distincts avec une nucléoshuttling retardée de la protéine ATM en commun. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4792. doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104792
[Cette étude clinique ci-dessus montre que les électrosensibles sont aussi radiosensibles avec retard de réparation de leur ADN et des cassures double-brin comme avec les rayonnements ionisants (UV, rayons X, rayons gamma) ou l’eau oxygénée (stress oxydatif). Cette étude clinique montre aussi deux types d’électrosensibilité : 1er type d’électrosensibilité : faibles symptômes en absence d’exposition électromagnétique mais fortes réactions lors d’expositions ; type plutôt associé à une prédisposition à des syndromes de cancer. 2ème type d’électrosensibilité : symptômes en absence d’exposition électromagnétique (mais présentant spontanément des cassures double-brin d’ADN et des déficiences de reconnaissance par les voies de réparation) et réaction modeste aux expositions ; type plutôt associé à un risque élevé de vieillissement accéléré].
Plus de détails sur l’étude ci-dessus : Priartem Ondes et santé – Une avancée scientifique importante : Une étude pionnière suggère une base biologique à l’électrosensibilité
Vidéo avec le responsable scientifique de l’étude ci-dessus, le chercheur Nicolas Foray, radiobiologiste : Ondes et santé – Etude DEMETER : une avancée scientifique importante sur l’électrosensibilité / EHS
Cancers
Wertheimer N, Leeper E. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Mar;109(3):273-284.
Dreher D, Junod AF. Role of oxygen free radicals in cancer development. Eur J Cancer. 1996 Jan;32A(1):30-8.
Pieroni L, Nafziger J, Arock M, Guillosson JJ. Can a 50 Hz electromagnetic field influence the preintegrative steps of replication of a murine retrovirus responsible for leukemia/lymphoma ? Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1997;44:279-284.
Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M, Roman E, Skinner J, Dockerty J, et al. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhoodleukemia. Br J Cancer 2000;692-698
Caplan LS, Schoenfeld ER, O’Leary ES, Leske MC. Breast cancer and electromagnetic fields-a review. Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Jan;10(1):31-44.
Stang A, Anastassiou G, Ahrens W, Bromen K, Bornfeld N, Jöckel KH. The possible Role of Radiofrequency Radiation in the Development of Uveal Melanoma. Epidemiology. 2001 Jan ;12(1):7-12.
Neil J. Cherry. Chilhood cancer in the vicinity of the Sutro Tower, San Francisco. Lincoln University, 19 septembre 2002. Disponible à l’adresse suivante : http://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/dspace/handle/10182/3969.
Draper G, Vincent T, Kroll ME, Swanson J. Chilhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England ans Wales : a case-control study. BMJ. 2005 Jun 4;330(7503):1290.
Pica F, Serafino A, Divizia M, Donia D, Fraschetti M, Sinibaldi-Salimei P, Giganti MG, Volpi A. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (elf-emf) on kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpes virus in bcbl-1 cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006,27:226-232.
Cardis E et. Al. The interphone Study Group:design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population. Europ. J. Epidemiol. 2007 22:647-664.
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Mild KH, Morgan LL. Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: increased risk associated with use for > or=10 years. Occup Environ Med. 2007 Sep;64(9):626-632.
« Orange to remove mobile mast form ‘Tower of Dom’, where cancer rate has soared », London Evening Standard, 6 août 2007, <www.standard.co.uk/news/orange-toremove-mobile-mast-from-tower-of-doom-where-cancer-ratehas-soared-7299925.html>.
Belpomme D, Irigaray P, hardell L, Clapp R, Montagnier L, Epstein S, Sasco AJ. The multitude and diversity of environmental carcinogens. Environ Res. 2007 Nov;105(3):414-429.
Belpomme D, Irigaray P, hardell L. Electromagnetic fields as cancer-causing agents. Environ Res. 2008 Apr;107(3):289-290.
Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A, Cardis E, Deutch Y, Duvdevani S, Zultan A, Novikov I, Freedman L, Wolf M. Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors – A nationwide case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 15;167(4):457-467.
Lloyd M, Estimating the risk of brain tumors from cellphone use:published case-control studies. Physiopathology. 2009 16:137-147.
Hardell L, Carlberg M. Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. Int J Oncol. 2009 Jul;35(1):5-17.
Myung SK, Ju W, Mdonnell DD, Lee YJ, Kazinets G, Cheng CT,Moskowitz JM. Mobile phone use and risk of tumors : a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20 ; 27(33):5565-5572.
Behrens T, Lynge E, Cree I, Sabroe S, Lutz JM, Afonso N, Eriksson M, Guénel P, Merletti F, Morales-Suarez-Varela M, Stengrevics A, Févotte J, Llopis-Gonzalez A, Gorini G, Sharkova G, Hardell L, Ahrens W. Occuoational exposure to electromagnetic fields ans sex-differential risk of uveal melanoma. Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov;67(11):751-9.
The Interphone Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use:results of the interphone international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;39(3):675-694.
WHO (IARC) Interphone study. Report on mobile phone use and brain cancer risk. Press release n°200. 17 Mai 2010. Wild Ch.
Reuter S, Gupta SC, Chaturvedi MM, Aggarwal BB. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer : how are they linked ? Free radic Biol Med. 2010 Dec 1;49(11):1603-16.
IARC report to the union for International cancer control (UICC) on the interphone study. WHO. 3 oct. 2011.
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumors and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects. Int J Oncol 2011 ; 38 :1465-1474.
Stein Y, Levy-Nativ O, Richter E. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents. Eur. J. Oncol. 2011 ; 16 (1):21-54.
Czerninski R, Zini A, Sgan-Cohen HD. Risk of parotid malignant tumors in Israel (1970-2006). Epidemiology. 2011 jan;22(1):130-1.
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K, Eriksson M. Case-control study on the use of mobile and cordless phones and the risk for malignant melanoma in the head and neck region. Pathophysiology. 2011 Sep;18(4):325-333.
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild KH. Re-analysis of risk for glioma in relation to mobile telephone use:comparison with the results of the Interphone international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):1126-1128.
The Interphone Study Group. Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use:results of the international case – control study. Cancer epidemiol 2011,35:453-464.
Dode AC, Leäo MM, Tejo Fde A, Gomes AC, Dode DC, Dode MC, Moreira CW, Condessa VA, Albinatti C, Caiaffa WT. Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep1;409(19):3649-3665.
Buldak RJ, Polaniak R, Buldak L, Zwirska-Korczala K, Skonieczna M, Monsiol A, Kukla M, Dulawa-Buldak A, Birkner E. Short-term exposure to 50 Hz ELF-EMF alters the cisplatin-induced oxidative response in AT478 murine squamous cell carcinoma cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012 Dec;33(8):641-651.
Shu X. Ahlbom A. Feychting M. Incidence trends of malignant parotid gland tumor in Swedish and Nordic adults 1970 to 2009. Epidemiology 2012;23(5):766-767.
Yang L, Hao D, Wang M, Zeng Y Wu S, Zeng Y. Cellular neoplastic transformation induced by 916 MHz microwave radiation. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012 Aug;32(6):1039-1046.
Naziroglu M, Cig B, Dogan S, Uguz AC, Dilek S, Faouzi D. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca²□ influx in human leukemia cancer cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012;88(6):449-456.
Dickinson A, Yeung KY, Donoghue J, Baker MJ, Kelly RDW, McKenzie M, Johns TG, St. John JC. The regulation of mitochondrial DNA copy number in glioblastoma cells. Cell death Differ. 2013;20:1644-1653.
Ledoigt G, Belpomme D. Cancer induction pathways and HF-EMF irradiation. Adv Biol Chemistry. 2013;3:177-186.
West JG, Kapoor NS, Liao SY, Chen JW, Bailey L, Nagourney RA. Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones. Case Rep Med. 2013;2013:354682.
Sun JW, Li XR, Gao HY, Yin JY, Qin Q, Nie SF, Wei S. Electromagnetic field exposure and male breast cancer risk :a meta-analysis of 18 studies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(1):523-528.
Bounds PL, Kuster N. Cryptochrome a Primary Sensor of Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields in Chilhood Leukemia ? Biophysical J. 2014 ; 108:562a.
Meitzler JL, Antony S, Wu Y, Juhasz A, Liu H, Jiang G, Lu J, Roy K, Doroshow JH. NADPH Oxidases : A Perspective on Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Tumor Biology. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014 Jun 10; 20(17):2873-2889.
Coureau G, Bouvier G, Lebailly P, Fabbro-Peray P, Gruber A, Leffondre K, Guillamo JS, Loiseau H, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Salamon R, Baldi I. Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jul;71(7):514-522 ;13.
Lugrin J, Rosenblatt-Velin N, Parapanov R, Liaudet L. The role of oxidative stress during inflammatory processes. Biol Chem. 2014 Feb;395(2):203-30.
Ozgur E, Guler G, Kismali G, Seyhan N. Mobile phone radiation alters proliferation of hepatocarcinoma cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014;70(2):983-991.
Hardell L, Carlberg M. Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009. Pathophysiology. 2015 Mar;22(1):1-13.
De Vocht F. Inferring the 1985-2014 impact of mobile phone use on selected brain cancer subtypes using Bayesian structural time series and synthetic controls. Environ Int. 2016 Nov 8;97:100-107.
Carlberg M, Hedendahl L, Ahonen M, Koppel T, Hardell L. Increasing incidence ot thyroid cancer in the Nordic countries with main focus on Swedish data. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:426.
Milham S, Stetzer D. Tumor-specific frequencies and ocular melanoma. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016 Aug 23:1-5.
Wyde M, Cesta M, Blystone C, Elmore S, Foster P, Hooth M, Kissling G, Malarkey D, Sills R, Stout M, Walker N, Witt K, Wolfe M, Bucher J. Report of partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd : Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposures). BioRxiv prepint first posted online 2016 May. 26 ; doi:http//dx.doi.org/10.1101/055699. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/ntp-temp/tr595_508.pdf
De Siqueira EC, de Souza FT, Gomez RS, Gomes CC, de Souza RP. Does cell phone use increase the chances of parotid gland tumor development?A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017 Aug;46(7):480-483.
Lim H, Devesa SS, Sosa JA, Check D, Kitahara CM. Trends in Thyroid Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States, 1974-2013. JAMA. 2017 Apr 4;317(13):1338-1348.
Yang M, Guo W, Yang C, Tang J, Huang Q, Feng S, Jiang A, Xu X, Jiang G. Mobile phone use and glioma risk : A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0175136.
Qureshi ST, Memon SA, Abassi AR, Sial MA, Bughio FA. Radiofrequency radiations induced genotoxic and carcinogenic effects on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) root tip cells. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017 May;24(4):883-891.
Havas M. When theory and observation collide : can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer ? Environ Pollut. 2017 Feb;221:501-505.
EMF Call : Appel des scientifiques et des ONG à des limites véritablement protectrices pour l’exposition aux champs électromagnétiques (100 KHz à 300 GHz).
Luo J, Deziel NC, Huang H, Chen Y, Ni X, Ma S, Udelsman R, Zhang Y. Cell phone use and risk of thyroid cancer:a population-based case-control study in Connecticut. Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Oct Jan;29:39-45.
Röösli M, Lagorio S, Schoemaker MJ, Schüz J, Feychting M. Brain and Salivary Gland Tumors and Mobile Phone Use : Evaluating the Evidence from Various Epidemiological Study Designs. Annual Review of Public Health. 2018 Dec 28;40:221-238.
NTP technical report on Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in HSD:Sprague Dawley SD rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by Cell phones. Disponible à l’adresse suivante : https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/trpanel/2018/march/tr595peerdraft.pdf.
NTP technical report on toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in B6C3F1/N mice exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (1,900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones. Disponible à l’adresse suivante : https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/tr-panel/2018/march/tr596peerdraft.pdf.
Falconi L, Bua L, Tibaldi E, Lauriola M, De Angelis L, Gnudi F, Mandrioli D, Manservigi M, Manservisi F, Manzoli I, Menghetti I, Montella R, Panzacchi S, Sgargi D, Strollo V, Vornoli A, Belpoggi F. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission. Environ Res. 2018 Aug ; 165:496-503.
Lin JC. The Significance of Primary Tumors in the NTP Study of Chronic Rat Exposure to Cell Phone Radiation [Health Matters]. IEEE Microwave Magazine. 20(11):18-21. Nov 2019. DOI:10.1109/MMM.2019.2935361.
Hardell L, Carlberg M. Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicoloy and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz. Int J Oncol. 2019 Jan;54(1):111-127.
Carpenter DO. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and cancer : How source of funding affects results. Environ Res. 2019 Nov;178:108688.
Carles C, Esquirol Y, Turuban M, Piel C, Migault L, Pouchieu C, Bouvier G, Fabbro-Peray P, Lebailly P, Baldi I. Residential proximity to power lines and risk of brain tumor in the general population. Environ Res. 2020 Jun;185:109473.
Bevelacqua JJ, Mehdizadeh AR, Mortazavi SMJ. A New Look at Three Potential Mechanisms Proposed for the Carcinogenesis of 5G Radiation. J Biomed Phys Eng. Article in Press. 2020.
Faune (Animaux)
Tanner J, Romero-Sierra C, Davie S. Non-thermal Effects of Microwave Radiation on Birds. Nature. 1967:216:1139.
Greenberg B, Bindokas VP, Gauger JR. Biological effects of a 765-kV transmission line: exposures and thresholds in honeybee colonies. Bioelectromagnetics. 1981;2(4):315-328.
Kirschvink J. Birds, bees and magnetism: A new look at the old problem of magnetoreception. Trends in Neurosciences. 1982;5:160-167.
Gould JL. Magnetic field sensitivity in animals. Annu Rev Physiol. 1984;46:585-598
Bindokas VP, Gauger JR, Greenberg B. Exposure scheme separates effects of electric shock and electric field for honey bees, Apis mellifera L. Bioelectromagnetics. 1988;9(3):275-284.
Bindokas VP, Gauger JR, Greenberg B. Laboratory investigations of the electrical characteristics of honey bees and their exposure to intense electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1989;10(1):1-12.
Lohmann KJ, Lohmann C. A Light-Independent Magnetic Compass in the Leatherback Sea Turtle. Biol Bull. 1993 Aug;185(1):149-151.
Hanowski JAM, Niemi GG, Blake JG. Response of Breeding and Migrating Birds to Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Ecological Applications. 1996 Aug;6(3):910.
Kirschvink J, Padmanabha S, Boyce C, Oglesby J. Measurement of the threshold sensitivity of honeybees to weak, extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. J Exp Biol. 1997;200(Pt 9):1363-1368.
Fernie KJ, Bird DM. Evidence of oxidative stress in American kestrels exposed to electromagnetic fields. Environ Res. 2001 Jun;86(2):198-207.
Hole DG, Whittingham MJ, Bradbury RB, Anderson GQ, Lee PL, Wilson JD, Krebs JR. Widespread local house-sparrow extinctions. Nature. 2002 Aug 29;418(6901):931-932.
Balmori A. Possible Effects of Electromagnetic Fields from Phone Masts on a Population of White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagn Biol Med. 2005 Jul;4:109-119.
Everaert J, Bauwens D. A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Electromagn Biol Med. 2007;26(1):63-72.
Leger J, Larochelle J. On the importance of radiative heat exchange during nocturnal flight in birds. J. Exp. Biol. 2006 Jan;209(Pt 1):103-114.
Rejt L, Mazgajski T, Kubacki R, Kieliszek J, Sobiczewska E, Szmigielski S. Influence of radar radiation on breeding biology of tits (Parus sp.). Electromagn Biol Med. 2007;26(3):235-238.
Vijayalaxmi, Prihoda TJ. Genetic damage in mammalian somatic cells exposed to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: a meta-analysis of data from 87 publications (1990-2007). Int J Radiat Biol. 2009 Mar;85(3):196-213.
Burda H, Begall S, Cerveny J, Neef J, Nemec P. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic alignment of ruminants. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):5708-5713.
Pourlis AF. Reproductive and developmental effects of EMF in vertebrate animal models. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):179-189.
Severini M, Bosco L, Atilla R, Loy M, Bonori M, Giuliani L, Bedini A, Giliberti C, Palomba R, Pesolillo S, Giacomozzi E, Castellano AC. Métamorphosis delay in Xenopus laevis (Daudin) tadpoles exposed to a 50 Hz weak magnetic field. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010 Jan;86(1):37-46.
Gegear RJ, Foley LE, Casselman A, Reppert SM. Animal cryptochromes mediate magnetoreception by an unconventional photochemical mechanism. Nature. 2010 Feb 11;463(7282):804-807.
Sharma VP, Kumar NR. Changes in honeybee behaviour and biology under the influence of cellphone radiations. Curr Sci. 2010;98(10):1376-1378.
Sainudeen SS. Impact of mobile phones on the density of honeybees. J. Pub. Admin. Pol. Res. 3:131-137, Jan 2011.
Sainudeen Sahib S. Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Clashes with Honey Bees. Inter J Environ Sci. 2011;1(5):897-900.
Favre D. Mobile phone-induced honeybee worker piping. Apidologie. 2011;42:270-279.
Cammaerts MC, De Doncker P, Patris X, Bellens F, Rachidi Z, Cammaerts D. GSM 900 MHz radiation inhibits ants’ association between food sites and encountered cues. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Jun;31(2):151-165.
Kumar NR, Rana N, Kalia P. Biochemical changes in haemolymph of Apis mellifera L. drone under the influence of cell phone radiations. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2013;5(1):139-141.
O’Neill P. Magnetoreception and baroreception in birds. Develop. Growth Differ. 2013;55(1):188-197.
Engels S, Schneider NL, Lefeldt N, Hein CM, Zapka M, Michalik A, Elbers D, Kittel A, Hore PJ, Mouritsen H. Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird. Nature. 2014 May 15;509(7500):353-356.
Kavokin K, Chernetsov N, Pakhomov A, Bojarinova J, Kobylkov D, Namozov B. Magnetic orientation of garden warblers (Sylvia borin) under 1.4 MHz radiofrequency magnetic field. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Aug 6;11(97):20140451.
Cammaerts MC, Johansson O. Ants can be used as bio-indicators to reveal biological effects of electromagnetic waves from some wireless apparatus. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Dec;33(4):282-288.
Malkemper EP, Eder SH, Begall S, Phillips JB, Winklhofer M, Hart V, Burda H. Magnetoreception in the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus): influence of weak frequency-modulated radio frequency fields. Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 29;4:9917.
Kolbabova T, Pascal Malkemper E, Bartos L, Vanderstraeten J, Turcani M, Burda H. Effect of exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields on melatonin levels in calves is seasonally dependent. Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 18;5:14206.
Lee D, Lee J, Lee I. Cell phone-generated radio frequency electromagnetic field effects on the locomotor behaviors of the fishes Poecilia reticulata and Danio rerio. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015;91(10):843-850.
Shende VA, Patil KG. Electromagnetic Radiations: A Possible Impact on Population of House Sparrow (Passer Domesticus). Engineering International. 2015;3(1):45-52.
Dalio JS. Effects of Electromagnetic (cell phone) radiations on Apis mellifera. J Res Agric Animal Sci. 2015;2(12):6-10.
Schwarze S, Schneider NL, Reichl T, Dreyer D, Lefeldt N, Engels S, Baker N, Hore PJ, Mouritsen H. Weak Broadband Electromagnetic Fields are More Disruptive to Magnetic Compass Orientation in a Night-Migratory Songbird (Erithacus rubecula) than Strong Narrow-Band Fields. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Mar 22;10:55.
Zhang ZY, Zhang J, Yang CJ, Lian HY, Yu H, Huang XM, Cai P. Coupling Mechanism of Electromagnetic Field and Thermal Stress on Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 9;11(9):e0162675.
Lazaro A, Chroni A, Tscheulin T, Devalez J, Matsoukas C, Petanidou T. Electromagnetic radiation of mobile telecommunication antennas affects the abundance and composition of wild pollinator. J Insect Conservation. 2016;20(2):1-10.
Cammaerts MC (2017). Is Electromagnetism One of the Causes of the CCD? A Work Plan for Testing This Hypothesis. Journal of Behavior. 2017;2(1):1006.
Manta AK, Papadopoulou D, Polyzos AP, Fragopoulou AF, Skouroliakou AS, Thanos D, Stravopodis DJ, Margaritis LH. Mobile-phone radiation-induced perturbation of gene-expression profiling, redox equilibrium and sporadic-apoptosis control in the ovary of Drosophila melanogaster. Fly (Austin). 2017 Apr 3;11(2):75-95.
Thielens A, Bell D, Mortimore DB, Greco MK, Martens L, Wout J. Exposure of Insects to Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz. Scientific Reports. 2018;8 :3924.
Flore (Plantes)
Selga T, Selga M. Response of Pinus sylvestris L. needles to electromagnetic fields. Cytological and ultrastructural aspects. Science of the Total Environment. 1996;180(1):65-73.
Tafforeau M, Verdus MC, Norris V, White G, Demarty M, Thellier M, Ripoll C. SIMS study of the calcium-deprivation step related to epidermal meristem production induced in flax by cold shock or radiation from a GSM telephone. J Trace Microphone Techniques. 2002;20:611-623.
Tafforeau M, Verdus MC, Norris V, White GJ, Cole M, Demarty M, Thellier M, Ripoll C. Plant sensitivity to low intensity 105 GHz electromagnetic radiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004 Sep;25(6):403-407.
Beaubois E, Girard S, Lalechere S, Davies E, Paladian F, Bonnet P, Ledoigt G, Vian A. Intercellular communication in plants: evidence for two rapidly-transmitted systemic signals generated in responses to EMF stimulation in tomato. Plant Cell Environ., 30 (2007) 834-844.
Ahmad M, Galland P, Ritz T, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Magnetic intensity affects cryptochrome-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta. 2007;225(3):615-624.
Roux D, Vian A, Girard S, Bonnet P, Paladian F, Davies E, Ledoigt G. High frequency (900 MHz) low amplitude (5 V m-1) electromagnetic field: a genuine environmental stimulus that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato. Planta. 2008 Mar;227(4):883-891.
Ledoigt G. La réponse des plantes aux stress de l’environnement. Auvergne Sciences (Bulletin de l’ADASTA). 2008;69:22-27.
Tkalec M, Malaric K, Pavlica M, Pevalek-Kozlina B, Vidakovic-Cifrek Z. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on seed germination and root meristematic cells of Allium cepa L. Mutat Res. 2009 Jan 31;672(2):76-81.
Kouzmanova M, Dimitrova M, Dragolova D, Atanasova G, Atanasov N. Alterations in Enzyme Activities In Leaves After Exposure Of Plectranthus Sp. Plants To 900 Mhz Electromagnetic Field. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 2009;23:611-615.
Haggerty K. Adverse influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling Aspen Seedlings: Preliminary Observations. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2010:1-7, Article ID 836278, doi:10.1155/2010/836278.
Jangid RK, Sharma R, Sudarsan Y, Eapen S, Singh G, Purohit AK. Microwave treatment induced mutations and altered gene expression in Vigna aconitifolia. Biologia Plantarum 2010;54(4):703-706.
Pesnya DS, Romanovski AV. Comparison of cytotoxic and genetoxic effects of plutonium-239 alpha particles and mobile phone GSM 900 radiation in the Allium cepa test. Mutat Res. 2013 Jan 20;750(1-2):27-33.
Waldann-Selsam C, Eger H. Tree damage in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Translation of the german article: Baumschaden im Umkreis von Mobilfunksendeanlagen, umwelt-medizin-gesellschaft. 2013;26:198-208.
Maffei ME. Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution. Front Plant Sci. 2014 Sep 4;5:445.
Sharma S, Parihar L. Effect of Cell Phone Radiation on Nodule Formation in the Leguminous Plants. Curr World Environ 2014;9(1):145-155.
Grémiaux A, Girard S, Guérin V, Lothier J, Baluska F, Davies E, Bonnet P, Vian A. Low-amplitude, high-frequency electromagnetic field exposure causes delayed and reduced growth in Rosa hybrida. J Plant Physiol. 2016 Jan 15;190:44-53.
Kumar A, Singh HP, Batish DR, Kaur S, Kohli RK. EMF radiations (1800 MHz) – inhibited early seedling growth of maize (Zea mays) involves alterations in starch and sucrose metabolism. Protoplasma. 2016 Jul;253(4):1043-1049.
Oluwajobi AO, Falusi OA, Zubbair NA, Owoeye T, Ladejobi F, Dangana MC, Abubakar A. DNA of Hibiscus sabdariffa Damaged by Radiation from 900 MHz GSM Antenna. Int J Biol Biomol Agricult Food Biotechnol. Engineering. 2016;10(1):49-54.
Procopio M, Link J, Engle D, Witczak J, Ritz T, Ahmad M. Kinetic Modeling of the Arabidopsis Cryptochrome Photocycle: FADH(o) Accumulation Correlates with Biological Activity. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:888.
Exemples de biais des études des lobbies industriels niant les effets nocifs des champs électromagnétiques artificiels
Extraits : Le livre noir des ondes – Les dangers des technologies sans fil …, sous la direction du Pr Dominique BELPOMME, 2020 – Ch 3, sect 4, p. 160 : Eléments critiques invalidant les résultats négatifs obtenus par les tests de provocation réalisés chez des sujets électrohypersensibles :
1) Critères d’inclusion non correctement définis en raison de leur manque d’objectivité (marqueurs biologiques non utilisés).
2) Non prises en compte d’une association possible à une sensibilité multiple aux produits chimiques (MCS).
3) Non prise en compte du fait que certains sujets sont sensibles à certaines fréquences et pas à d’autres.
4) Durée d’exposition trop courte.
5) Temps de recueil des symptômes trop précoces.
6) Possibilité d’un conditionnement psychologique lié au passé de souffrance des malades ».
Extraits : Le livre noir des ondes – Les dangers des technologies sans fil …, sous la direction du Pr Dominique BELPOMME, 2020 – Ch 8, sect 2, p. 158 : Biais possibles de l’étude Interphone [Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild KH. Re-analysis of risk for glioma in relation to mobile telephone use:comparison with the results of the Interphone international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):1126-1128] (recherche d’un lien associatif entre l’utilisation d’un téléphone portable et la survenue d’une tumeur du cerveau) :
1) Biais dans la sélection des sujets témoins (41% de refus).
2) Absence d’un nombre suffisant d’utilisateurs de longue durée.
3) Problème dans la définition des utilisateurs réguliers.
4) Non inclusion des jeunes adultes et des enfants.
5) Pas de prise en compte des utilisateurs ayant une mauvaise réception.
6) Pas de prise en compte des autres sources électromagnétiques.
7) Prises en compte de seulement 3 types de tumeurs cérébrales.
8) Pas de prise en compte du côté d’utilisation du téléphone portable et de la survenue de la tumeur.
9) Exclusion des sujets trop malades et des sujets décédés.
10) Étude rétrospective faisant appel aux souvenirs des personnes interrogées ».
genoudos.com 